Note: We have moved!
this blog you will now be updated daily, on a new Servier:
sincerely
your team of Resident courier
PNG with transparency
src = "pngtest.png" width = "173" height = "173" alt = "This is the alt-Text" /> PNG with TITLE-Attribute
src = "pngtest.png" width = "173" height = "173"
title = "This is the title-Text" alt = "This is the alt-Text" /> PNG within a link
href = "#" onclick = "alert('click');return false;" >
src = "pngtest.png" width = "173" height = "173"
title = "This is the title-Text" alt = "This is the alt-Text" />
PNG within a link and a STYLE-Attribute
href = "#" onclick = "alert('click');return false;" >
src = "pngtest.png" width = "173" height = "173"
style = "border:1.0em dashed #090;padding:10px;margin:10px;"
title = "This is the title-text" alt = "This is the alt-text" />
Div with PNG background via CSS
>
style = " float: left; width: 173px; height: 173px;
background: url (pngtest.png); " >
This is a div-Container using a png as background ...
style = "float: right; width: 346px; height: 346px;
background: white url (pngtest.png);" >
This is a div-Container using a png as background ...
style = "clear:both;" >
Input with PNG-Source
>
...
3.
...
Test PNG (without transparency in IE 5.5 & 6) var tmp ='';
for (var i = 0; i \u0026lt;= rows.length; i + +) {tmp + =
'
' + alert rows [i ]+'';
}
(tmp);
/ / is faster
var tmp = [];
for (var i = 1; i \u0026lt;= rows.length; i + +) {
tmp [i] = '
' + rows [i-1] + ' ';} $
alert (tmp.join (''));
var range = $ ('# container');
var link = bereich.find ('a');
var table = bereich.find ('table'); . The idea of this fine piece of CSS technology is a new part for the series beautiful new CSS , the other parts, I at this point would also like to recommend again: box-shadow ? With box-shadow can miss any HTML elements a nice shadow effect. The specifications see this shadow in front of several at once. Especially handy is that the shadow grows in size and change the box or mitschrumpft rounds at the rounded corners as well. box-shadow ? / * Simple shadow * /
# test {box-shadow: 8px 8px # 666;} / * Simple shadow * / # test
{box-shadow : 8px 8px # 666;} / * Soft Shadows * /
# test {box-shadow: 8px 8px 8px # 666;} / * Soft Shadows * /
# test { box-shadow : 8px 8px 8px # 666;} / * shadow with a fixed radius * / # test
{box-shadow: 8px 8px 8px 8px # 666;} / * shadow with a fixed radius * / # Test
{box-shadow : 8px 8px 8px 8px # 666;} / * Four Shadow at once * / # test
{box-shadow -8px 8px 8px-yellow;} / * Four Shadow at once * / # test
{box-shadow : 8px 8px 8px red - 8px 8px 8px green , 8px - 8px 8px blue - 8px - 8px 8px yellow ;} inset keyword somewhere to place in the informal definition: / * Inner Shadow * /
# test {box-shadow: 8px 8px 8px # inset 666;} / * Inner Shadow * / # test
{box-shadow : inset 8px 8px 8px # 666 ;} is box-shadow ? In terms box-shadow (with -webkit or -moz prefix), but between that which delivered the three browsers at the end of optical, still visible differences. box-shadow and before there is an Internet Explorer CSS3 features that freezes the hell. That's a pity, because box-shadow I think it rather less fit for it, act like text shadows and rounded corners as additional decoration, to which one can do without at a pinch, too. If we had full support for this feature, however, we could save so many bytes of image file and flexible layouts, simple design and / or beautiful. But still it is not so far.